Month: August 2019

Posted on

Creativity in Constraint: YouTube’s Six-Second Videos.

When it comes to video length, a challenge is the tendency to equate “shorter with worse” simply because viewers aren’t used to ultra-short content (like 6-second videos) just yet. But that’s about to change, as lot of big brands with deep pockets have been exploring “six-second ads” including YouTube’s own marketing team.

According to YouTube’s marketing team “the key to success is to view the six-second time frame as a blank canvas rather than a limitation.” I like the sound of that.

Lots of Examples

All of the examples shown below have been produced for large corporations, with large budgets and most likely big crews. But the reason I believe this is relevant to small-crew and 1 -Person crew productions is because the applications are the same. Short-form videos may be a condensed version of longer stories, or they might be customized to reach specific audiences, for example YouTube vs. Instagram vs, LinkedIn.

Cool? Let’s move on. Other great examples are the Duracell bumper ad, the sequential story for Xbox, or the product lineup for La Mer.

Two different approaches

I believe the most interesting examples happen when brands approach the six-second ads as part of a larger campaign—when storytelling expands beyond the boundaries of  one ad unit and spans multiple ads served to the same viewer over time. For instance, KFC used a six-second add to tease an UPCOMING 30-second commercial.

Conversely, Danone used the six-second video as a way to echo something a viewer had already seen in a PREVIOUS video.

More Examples

Similar campaigns by Estée Lauder, and SurveyMonkey are also meaty and memorable. According to SurveyMonkey “the 6-second time constraint was a great driver for creating a sense of energy while communicating the power of the tool simply. This was accomplished by effectively messaging the main components of our platform: creating surveys, collecting answers, and analyzing results.”

As I mentioned earlier, short-form ads an d videos may be a condensed version of a longer story, or they might customized to reach specific audiences through contextual targeting. Campbell’s Soup Company took the latter approach for its “SoupTube” campaign in Australia.

The Campbell’s Soup Approach

Here’s what Campbell’s did: To amplify a 15-second ad they created hundreds of variations of 6-second ads and ran them as additional media. Using some fancy audience targeting, Campbell’s delivered the contextually relevant 6-second ads to users by matching its product message with trending YouTube videos.

For example, users who searched for Pokémon Go were shown one ad/video where they were asked, “Legs hurt from walking around?”, while users searching the outcome of a specific soccer match saw a different version of the ad asking “Had your money on England?”

By building multiple 6-second stories that offered different facets of its message, Campbell’s proved that short-form ads can provide powerful touches to boost a longer story.

The Theory vs. Reality

Campbell’s original hypothesis was that the six-second version would “help drive upper funnel metrics like ad recall” and the thirty-second version would “build on that initial impact by telling a longer story to shift perception.” That’s pretty technical, but I get the concept.

What happened with that hypothesis? Glad you asked. The 6-second clips alone were LESS effective than the 30-sec videos to shift brand perception. But, and this is important, when the 6-second clip and 30-sec clip were paired through remarketing (essentially exposing people who had seen the long-form ad to a bumper as a follow-up) the 6-second clips were a great way to reinforce the 30-sec clips.

30-30-6

According to YouTube “the optimal media journey for a viewer is a 30-sec spot followed by another 30-sec spot, followed by a 6-second ad.”

Let’s say you just finished a travel video you would like to promote. It doesn’t hurt (and it doesn’t take that MUCH extra work either) to cut different 30-sec teasers and a few 6-second clips, and try to target specific audiences based on each platform. You could target groups that talk about that specific destination on Facebook, and travel companies on LinkedIn and travel enthusiasts on Instagram. Same travel video, slightly different marketing approaches targeting different people.

What do you think? Leave your comments below.

SOCIAL
YouTube: 1PersonCrew
Instagram: @1PersonCrew

[jetpack_subscription_form show_only_email_and_button=”true” custom_background_button_color=”undefined” custom_text_button_color=”undefined” submit_button_text=”Subscribe” submit_button_classes=”undefined” show_subscribers_total=”false” ]
Posted on

How to charge multiple batteries at once.

It makes no sense to have a super light laptop and/or camera system and having to carry a heavy bag full of chargers, adapters, and cords.

Also, I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one who has forgotten expensive chargers at hotels (Buenos AIres, Casablanca and Houston) and airports (Porto and Barcelona to name a few), or who has lost a cable that could NOT be replaced (try finding USB-C cables in Myanmar).

And what about spending 14 hours shooting on location, getting late at night to your hotel to dump the day’s footage, and not being able to go to bed because you have to make sure all the batteries are fully charged for the following day? It simply sucks.

So my goal was to find a simple way to charge multiple batteries at once, minimize the amount of chargers and cables, and make everything fit into the most compact package. Ah, and also super important, be able to use this setup anywhere in the world.

Let me introduce you to “the Octopus” a gadget I’ve been using (and fine-tuning) for quite a while. Right now I can charge seventeen (17) batteries and/or devices, with a system that weights only 2.12 pounds (or 0.96 kilos). And the best part, I only need ONE international adapter.

Let’s see what I have on my current setup:

Here’s what you’ll need to build a similar “Octopus”:

One last thing. I don’t know why, but sometimes a “brand name” battery costs more than two third-party batteries, sometimes even including the charger! I’ve using Wasabi batteries and Watson batteries for a long time and never noticed a performance difference against the “original” brand. I don’t know about other brands, but Wasabi and Watson work fine.

Check this out, ONE Sony NP-F970 costs $125.99. You can get the same battery under the “Watson” brand for almost half the price, $69.99. But for only $49.99 you can get TWO “Wasabi” batteries, with an adapter, plus a car charger AND a European plug. Wow!